Print

2023-02-05 17:08:53 By : Mr. sir su

Click here to see Canada’s most comprehensive listing of projects in conceptual and planning stages

Click here to see Canada’s most comprehensive listing of projects in conceptual and planning stages

TORONTO — A worker was injured after falling 30 feet from a roof at a construction project and as a result Lakeridge Developments (Muskoka) Limited of Port Carling, Ont. was fined $50,000 and Paul Kritski, supervisor of Peak Roofing Services Inc., was fined $15,000.

The incident took place at a construction site at 92A Scully Rd., Seguin on Nov. 12, 2020.

The parties were convicted June 21, 2022. Both fines were imposed by Justice of the Peace Diane McAleer following a guilty plea at the provincial offences court in Parry Sound.

On the date the incident occurred Lakeridge Developments was constructing a new cottage, guest cottage and two boathouses on a property in Seguin and had subcontracted Peak Roofing Services to provide workers to install the roofing.

A worker from Peak Roofing Services was on a flat section of roof, moving insulation, when they fell 30 feet to the ground below and suffered a critical injury.

A Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development investigation found there were permanent, engineered anchor points on the roof and that the worker had fall protection training, however, at the time of the incident, the worker was not using fall protection and there were no guardrails installed along the perimeter of the roof, indicates a court bulletin.

Kritski, and three additional workers were also on the roof that morning and fall protection was not being used by any of the crew.

Section 26.1 of Ontario Regulation 213/91 for construction projects requires workers to be protected from falls through use of an adequate guardrail system or adequate fall protection.

Lakeridge Developments contravened Section 23(1)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act by failing, as a constructor, to ensure that the measures and procedures required by Section 26.1 of Ontario Regulation 213/91 were carried out.

Kritski contravened Section 27(1)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act by failing, as a supervisor, to ensure those same measures and procedures were carried out.

comments for this post are closed

When it comes to the market outlook for 2023, the industry is going to see a con...

HAMILTON, ONT. — Hamilton Police are investigating four instances of tool thefts...

Panellists at a recent construction forecast event expressed both short-term and...

Terms like incubators, accelerators and seed capital are generally linked to the...

Slate Asset Management recently offered a first glimpse of plans for the redevel...

ARLINGTON, VA. — Falling prices for diesel fuel, lumber and steel cooled inflati...

OTTAWA — The Ottawa Hospital recently announced a first in Ontario health care a...

Like other sectors of the Canadian economy, the health care industry wants to sp...

When it comes to the market outlook for 2023, the industry is going to see a con...

HAMILTON, ONT. — Hamilton Police are investigating four instances of tool thefts...

Panellists at a recent construction forecast event expressed both short-term and...

Terms like incubators, accelerators and seed capital are generally linked to the...

A B.C. Court of Appeal ruling has upheld a B.C. Supreme Court (BCSC) ruling allo...

The Residential Construction Council of Ontario (RESCON) recently made a $25,000...

Facade work is reaching the top floor of the Oben Flats-Castlefield Design Distr...

It’s been a long and hard road for construction worker Jacob Hurl, who was trapp...

© 2023 ConstructConnect Canada, Inc. All rights reserved. The following rules apply to the user of this site: Master Subscription Agreement, Terms and Conditions of Acceptable Use, Copyright Notice, Accessibility and Privacy Statement